In cyberspace, there are no agreed rules that describe and govern what type of behavior is and is not acceptable. There have been several efforts in this direction, notably the U.S.-China Cyber Agreement and work from the United Nations, in particular the UN Group of Government Experts (UNGGE). Unfortunately, the U.N. initiative faltered when several key countries backed out from the original agreement. Similarly, gaps in trust have led to concerns about a breakdown of the U.S.-China Cyber Agreement. Despite stumbles, these efforts provide a valuable starting point for creating a set of norms. The U.N. addressed a number of unacceptable actions for nations to take against another country such as attacking critical infrastructure, interfering with emergency response efforts, or using foreign networks to deploy wrongful acts. The U.S.-China Cyber Agreement attempted to codify the banning of intellectual property theft for profit. We cannot afford to let our progress towards setting international cyber norms be impeded any longer, nor can we afford to ignore the problem. There is too much at stake, namely our entire digital way of life. While addressing these broad challenges is ultimately the responsibility of governments around the world, our efforts to define norms for cyberspace behavior must also actively involve private industry, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and academia. In collaborating with colleagues around the world, John Davis has identified five norms that responsible nations should follow during peacetime to improve our common understanding, ensure oversight of cyber activities and engage additional responsible partners.